Search for: "KAT CONSTRUCTION LLC" Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2015, 12:22 am
 Bear with me dear reader, as I recognise the gravity of disgreeing with all of Floyd LJ, Ryder LJ, Arden LJ and Arnold J.But not everyonedoes ...The problem this Kat has is that they all rely on the subjective state of the infringer, whether it is subjective intent, or knowledge, even if the knowledge is constructive knowledge. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 10:52 am by Doug Cornelius
 KAT Remodeling and Mayor Webb has no construction background and the invoices were bogus. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:20 am
 In December 2012, just before Christmas, and just before this Kat rejoined the blogging team, Arnold J handed down the decision Microsoft Corp v Motorola Mobility LLC [2012] EWHC 3677 (Pat) (21 December 2012). [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 3:40 pm
This Kat welcomes all constructive initiatives of this nature. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 8:54 am
The only time Kats experience added matterWhat is the new trend for attacking a patent? [read post]
28 May 2020, 11:53 am by Thomas Key
Dolgencorp LLC - a case concerning the design of a chalk-holder. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 2:21 am
This Kat was so reminded in revisiting the 2013 decision of the United States Supreme Court, Already LLC dba Yums v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 2:04 am by Alessandro Cerri
The Court, however, applying the principles of construction established in Arnold v Britton, Wood v Capita and Rainy Sky, found that on a correct construction, the 1997 licence only licensed Ford’s US federal trade marks, and not any others. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 3:07 am
This brave Kat ventured through the 40-page long judgment, to catch a glimpse of all the six claims analyzed in the Order. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:31 am
This Kat posted last month on the fascinating case of Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWHC 72 (Pat), in which Arnold J gave the first detailed UK consideration of what a Swiss-form claim means. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 5:58 am
We now have, at the latest count, the following decisions that have resulted in refusal under s1(2):John Lahiri Khan (BL O/356/06) 11 December 2006Rockwell Firstpoint Contact (BL O/355/06) 11 December 2006Nintendo (BL O/377/06) 29 December 2006 (IPKat comments)New Constructs LLC (BL O/014/07) 12 January 2007 Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 2:35 am
 This Kat is a little disappointed that the judgment refers to the judge falling into error with no apparent acknowledgement that the source of the error is in fact the lack of a clear test being laid down in the earlier Court of Appeal judgment. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
CAS Medical Systems, Inc (Docket Report) District Court M D Pennsylvania: Conflicting claim constructions preclude finding of wilfulness: Arlington Industries v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
CAS Medical Systems, Inc (Docket Report) District Court M D Pennsylvania: Conflicting claim constructions preclude finding of wilfulness: Arlington Industries v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 5:01 pm
 Was it the excitement of being in a valley so inundated with innovation you can't swing a Kat without hitting a patent? [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:10 am by Marie Louise
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton (Patents Post Grant Blog) Lux – Similar products sold by unrelated defendants not warrant joinder in patent cases: Rude d/b/a ABT Sys., LLC v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:28 am
Stremicks Heritage Foods LLC (Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Delay seeking transfer of venue trumps other convenience factors: eTool Development, Inc. et al v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:00 am
: In re Kubin and KSR International Co v Teleflex Inc (Patent Docs)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: USPTO, Tafas & GSK request extension for reconsideration (IP Watchdog) CAFC: Patent on sex aid is obvious: Ritchie v Vast Resources (AKA Topco) (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Assigning patent rights: Euclid Chemical v Vector Corrosion (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) District Court E D Michigan: LEDdynamics wins summary judgment in LED tube patent suit (Green Patent Blog) District… [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm by News Desk
Specifically, our investigator observed that the floors in your processing area are not constructed from a material that could be easily cleaned and kept clean. [read post]